You supply the evidence
Entity, jurisdiction, account, spread, commission, other cost, time, position and pip value come only from your records.
Compare two or three broker or account scenarios from costs you verify for the same instrument, position, account currency and observation time. Model manual_broker_cost_comparison v1.0.0 calculates the all-in cost you entered without publishing broker rankings or choosing a broker.
Record costs from the exact broker pages, platform specifications or demo accounts you are comparing. The model does not supply, refresh or endorse those observations.
Entity, jurisdiction, account, spread, commission, other cost, time, position and pip value come only from your records.
Spread cost, all-in cost, all-in pips and differences are calculated from the entered same-context values.
Execution quality, slippage, swap, conversion, taxes, rebates, protections, service and suitability are not ranked.
Official broker documents show why a universal table can become misleading. FBS states that spread is the difference between bid and ask and that it can widen in changed market conditions. XM documents spreads and other charges in its client terms. FXOpen explains that commission can vary with account equity, trading volume, account currency and introducing arrangements. Those details are specific to the entity and account serving you, so this release does not republish a stale broker league table.
A tie is preserved when two or more entered scenarios produce the same lowest cost. “Lowest” is descriptive only within the current form and exact context. It is not a statement about future pricing or overall broker quality.
| Keep identical | Record per scenario | Evaluate separately |
|---|---|---|
| Instrument symbol and contract | Exact legal entity and jurisdiction | Official licence and client protections |
| Position size and open/close basis | Exact account type | Execution, rejection and slippage records |
| Account currency and pip value | Observed spread at one comparable time | Swap, conversion, funding and withdrawal fees |
| Observation window and session | Full round-trip commission and entered costs | Service, platform reliability and suitability |
The former page used an unsourced bundled file to publish broker spreads, account attributes, filters, cost rankings and comparison cards. All 18 rows remain removed from the deployable asset. This replacement never reads that file and does not restore broker ratings, leverage, minimum-deposit, regulation, execution-speed or “best broker” claims.
For each same-context scenario, spread cost = observed spread in pips × entered account-currency pip value. The page adds entered round-trip commission and other entered round-trip costs, then compares only the scenarios in the current form.
No broker feed, typical-spread table or quality score is used.
Scenario A uses a 1.2-pip observation, 10.00 account-currency pip value, 7.00 round-trip commission and 1.00 other cost: 1.2 × 10 + 7 + 1 = 20.00.
Scenario B uses 0.8 pips, the same 10.00 pip value, 10.00 commission and no other cost: 0.8 × 10 + 10 = 18.00. B is lower by 2.00 only for these entered observations.
“Lowest entered cost” identifies the smallest arithmetic total in the current form. It is not a best-broker ranking, future-spread forecast, execution-quality finding or suitability recommendation.
No. It has no broker spread feed and publishes no broker rows. You enter observations that you verify for the exact entity, account, instrument, position and time.
It is the smallest all-in cost calculated only from the two or three scenarios currently entered. It is not a best-broker claim, recommendation, quality score or prediction of future costs.
Version 1.0.0 multiplies the observed spread in pips by the entered account-currency pip value, then adds the entered round-trip commission and other entered round-trip costs.
Use the current pip value for the exact instrument, position size and account currency. The linked Pip Value Calculator can help. Do not assume every pair, metal, CFD, trade size or account has the same pip value.
A brand can serve clients through different entities and terms. Recording the entity and jurisdiction reduces the risk of comparing an account you cannot open or protections that do not apply to you.
The model does not estimate changing spreads, actual slippage, swap or financing, currency conversion, taxes, rebates, unentered fees, margin, liquidation, execution quality, service, regulation or future market conditions.
No. Regulation assessment, broker quality, suitability and recommendations are explicitly blocked. Verify the exact legal entity in the relevant regulator's official register and review its current client terms.
Version 1 stores only the form inputs in this browser under a separate local-storage key. It does not connect to broker credentials, balances, positions or orders. Clear saved inputs removes them.
Verify the exact entity, account, spread and current charges that apply to your jurisdiction.
Visit Broker →Review current trading conditions and record a same-time observation before comparing.
Visit Broker →Check entity-specific ECN commission and account conditions directly before entry.
Visit Broker →Risk and affiliate disclosure: Forex and leveraged products carry substantial risk. Broker links are affiliate links; we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.